Rome    Reggio Calabria     New York     Toronto    London

Internationalization

"Zagamilaw" International Law Firm, with its offices in New York, Toronto and London and thanks to the collaboration with its correspondent Partners, offers its activity of international consultancy and legal assistance both towards Italian clients living abroad and foreign clients living in Italy.

CONTINUE READING
Rome

Why choose Zagamilaw

Our team is composed by young, competent and motivated people that would be able to give you suggestions about every aspect of your matter. When we are engaged by a client for a legal case, the same client and the same case become to us absolutely important, in fact every professional of Zagamilaw will constantly assist you with the aid and supervision of the Firm's founder Lawyer Paolo Zagami

CONTINUE READING
Reggio Calabria

Recruiting

"Zagamilaw" International Law Firm, with its offices in New York, Toronto and London and thanks to the collaboration with its correspondent Partners, offers its activity of international consultancy and legal assistance both towards Italian clients living abroad and foreign clients living in Italy.

CONTINUE READING
New York

Feedback

“Zagamilaw is a fast growing and international business oriented law firm which offers assistance on all legal aspects of Italian residential and commercial real estate transaction and has been appointed between the Top 5 Italian Law firm for the Real Estate sector." - Corporate International Magazine

CONTINUE READING
Toronto City

International Tax Planning

The International Law Firm "Zagamilaw" is able to assist and advise companies and businesses wishing to implement an efficient international tax planning through proper allocation in different countries of their income derived from investment and management functions of the group, taking into account the different tax regimes and different tax rates adopted by each member, according to a general principle of legal supremacy of internal rules than those of other countries, subject to the existence of international agreements that address conflicts of imputation or double taxation.

CONTINUE READING
London

Santander Win in EU Court Case May Hinder Probes Into Tax

08.11.2014 « Back

Banco Santander SA (SAN)’s court victory in a case over Spanish tax breaks may hamper the European Union’s probes into unfair fiscal deals for multinational firms, lawyers said.
Today’s ruling at the EU General Court, on special treatment for companies that take a stake in overseas firms, follows the revelation of hundreds of fiscal deals with companies in Luxembourg, which sparked calls for tougher EU action to combat corporate tax dodging.
It “takes some wind out of the European Commission’s sails” Javier Ruiz Calzado, a lawyer at Latham & Watkins LLP in Brussels, said. The ruling “doesn’t mean the commission is going to surrender because the political pressure, particularly these days, is huge. But it’s going to be more difficult to navigate for them.”
The Spanish case is part of an EU campaign across the 28-nation bloc targeting tax breaks that may have given companies unfair advantages. Tax avoidance leaped to the top of the EU’s agenda yesterday after a group of investigative journalists published almost 28,000 documents cataloging how companies such as PepsiCo Inc., Ikea Group and FedEx Corp. lowered their tax bill via deals with Luxembourg.
Before the Luxembourg leaks, the EU was already reviewing agreements between Luxembourg and Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN), Ireland and Apple Inc. (AAPL), and Starbucks Corp. (SBUX) in the Netherlands.
In today’s ruling, the EU court in Luxembourg said the bloc’s competition regulators “failed to establish that the Spanish regime was selective.” The Spanish system “does not exclude, a priori, any category of undertaking from taking advantage of it.”
The judges gave “a reminder that there are limits” in assessing whether a tax measure is selective and thus potentially illegal under EU state subsidy rules, said Jose Luis Buendia, a lawyer at Garrigues, who represented Santander.
The commission will need to do “a lot more work” and prove that companies in comparable situations were disadvantaged to make their case against Apple, Starbucks and Amazon, Ruiz Calzado said.

www.bloomberg.com