Rome    Reggio Calabria     New York     Toronto    London

10 years celebration

Internationalization

"Zagamilaw" International Law Firm, with its offices in New York, Toronto and London and thanks to the collaboration with its correspondent Partners, offers its activity of international consultancy and legal assistance both towards Italian clients living abroad and foreign clients living in Italy.

CONTINUE READING
Rome

Why choose Zagamilaw

Our team is composed by young, competent and motivated people that would be able to give you suggestions about every aspect of your matter. When we are engaged by a client for a legal case, the same client and the same case become to us absolutely important, in fact every professional of Zagamilaw will constantly assist you with the aid and supervision of the Firm's founder Lawyer Paolo Zagami

CONTINUE READING
Reggio Calabria

Recruiting

"Zagamilaw" International Law Firm, with its offices in New York, Toronto and London and thanks to the collaboration with its correspondent Partners, offers its activity of international consultancy and legal assistance both towards Italian clients living abroad and foreign clients living in Italy.

CONTINUE READING
New York

Feedback

“Zagamilaw is a fast growing and international business oriented law firm which offers assistance on all legal aspects of Italian residential and commercial real estate transaction and has been appointed between the Top 5 Italian Law firm for the Real Estate sector." - Corporate International Magazine

CONTINUE READING
Toronto City

International Tax Planning

The International Law Firm "Zagamilaw" is able to assist and advise companies and businesses wishing to implement an efficient international tax planning through proper allocation in different countries of their income derived from investment and management functions of the group, taking into account the different tax regimes and different tax rates adopted by each member, according to a general principle of legal supremacy of internal rules than those of other countries, subject to the existence of international agreements that address conflicts of imputation or double taxation.

CONTINUE READING
London

The ECHR Judicial Dialogue and General International Law in Cyprus v. Turkey

14.05.2014 « Back

On 12 May 2014 the Court, sitting as a Grand Chamber, delivered the judgment on just satisfaction in Cyprus v. Turkey [hereinafter: Judgment], the first of this kind in inter-State proceedings under art. 33 ECHR. The Court awarded to the applicant State a substantial sum to compensate the material and moral damages suffered by two categories of Greek-Cypriot individual victims of violations of the Convention, i.e. the heirs of the forcibly disappeared and the enclaved inhabitants of Karpas peninsula. One may recall that in the judgment on the merits of 2001 the Grand Chamber had found several violations of the Convention by Turkey, arising out of the military occupation of northern Cyprus in 1974, the continuing division of the territory of Cyprus and the activities of the (still unrecognised) “Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus” (the “TRNC”). The finding that the lump sums awarded to Cyprus (30.000.000 € and 60.000.000 € for the first and second group respectively) shall be distributed to the affected population (Judgment, para. 58) breaks a ground, indeed prepared by some precedents, and constitutes the most important, but not the only, contribution of the judgment to the development of general international law.

From http://www.sidi-isil.org